Reasons why carbon dating is inaccurate Absolutely free 1to1 free online chatting

These techniques are applied to igneous rocks, and are normally seen as giving the time since solidification.The isotope concentrations can be measured very accurately, but isotope concentrations are not dates.So, we have a “clock” which starts ticking the moment something dies.

This is the “half-life.” So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years.

Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable C.

These techniques, unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative concentrations of parent and daughter products in radioactive decay chains.

For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40; uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207; rubidium-87 decays to strontium-87; etc.

The strength of the Earth's magnetic field affects the amount of cosmic rays entering the atmosphere.

A stronger magnetic field deflects more cosmic rays away from the Earth.

It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood.

There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks.

That is, they take up less than would be expected and so they test older than they really are.

Tags: , ,