cote de pablo dating married - Radioactive isotope dating fossils

The age for all these fossils was found to be less than 50,000 years1.

This is not predicted by conventional evolutionary theory; and other discoveries have been made concerning dinosaurs which also are not predicted by evolutionary theory such as the discovery of soft tissue in bones that are not or are only partially fossilized.

But, if they were not that old, merely thousands of years old, then carbon-14 dating applied to dinosaur fossils might detect some carbon-14 atoms. These findings about dinosaur fossils are just a piece of the evidence indicating assumed ages are perhaps mistaken.

Other pieces include carbon-14 in diamonds, other soft tissue found in dinosaur fossils, and evidence that conventional dating methods are inaccurate.

Also, this assumes that no natural process is depositing extra carbon-14 in the animal’s remains.

Assuming no intrusion of carbon-14 from external sources, the existing amount of carbon-14 resident in the animal’s remains will decay, assuming the current known decay rate.

If the accepted ages of millions of years for dinosaurs were to be found to be in error, this would be a problem to evolution.

The dinosaur dates reported below and discussed in the AOGS 2012 paper discussed throughout this article, included triceratops, hadrosaur, allosaurus, and acrocanthasaurs.

However, the abstract of the Miller presentation was removed from the website for the conference. Double-click on the box for Wednesday, Room Leo 2, BG02.

You will see presentation 5 is missing between 4 and 6.

Diamonds supposedly formed even further back in the past than dinosaurs —over a billion years ago.

There is even less reason to expect to find carbon-14 in them, but it has been found.

So, you might ask, why is this article about carbon-14 dating of dinosaurs?

Tags: , ,