Free online furry cyber sex chat rooms - Answers in genesis radiocarbon dating
We should also note Scott's caveat that this supposed concordance is only apparent via interpretation "within a Biblical framework which includes a global flood ...".As we shall see, it takes considerably more than that to make carbon dating agree with YEC timescales.
, and things never really improve much through its nine paragraphs.
The question itself is a complete nonsense, as no one except creationists ever mention carbon-14 dating and the age of the Earth as being related topics.
Correction factors and calibration data which account for varying ratios of C-14/C-13/C-12 are discussed below.
Scott presents some curious and generally incorrect, or at least grossly overstated, arguments to support his beliefs.
solar/cosmic neutrons striking nitrogen in the atmosphere thus converting it to C-14), he then manages to arrive at the odd assumption that carbon dating agrees with the YEC timescale of the Earth being only some 6,000 10,000 years old.
Please note this is less than two half-lives of C-14, which will become important as we delve further into Scott's article.
However, he limits his myth dispelling to correcting only the misconception that C-14 dating is used for age determinations of "millions of years", which of course it is not.
He also gives the correct reason for this, being that C-14 is a radioisotope with a half-life of ~5,600 years.
However, this is prior to adjustments made to correct any figures based on numerous factors, such as the type of sample being dated, its geographical and stratigraphic location, pre-treatment procedures, calibration adjustments, correction factors/multipliers, etc.
The initial Conventional Radiocarbon Age (CRA) used wood from 1890 CE (prior to extensive fossil fuel pollution of the atmosphere) as an absolute radiocarbon standard, corrected to 1950 CE, which is considered as 0 years before present (BP), and the assumptions that the isotope decay is constant and that atmospheric C-14 levels have remained stable in the past.
Add to that the rather unscientific term "prove" and the question of the title can be seen, rightly, as something of a To give Scott some credit, though, his first task in the article is to dispel the "common myth" that carbon-14 dating has any bearing on measurements of the age of the Earth.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating